| Online Survey Software

100%

2019 NLADA Annual Conference - Innovative Justice

Overall Conference Evaluation

November 6-9, 2019 ~ Detroit, Michigan

Please answer the questions below. Your evaluation, including suggestions and comments, are important to conference staff and will help us improve future conferences.

Be sure to click DONE at the bottom when you have completed your evaluation.

Please choose the one major role that best describes who you are and why you attended the conference.

Executive Director/CEO LSC-funded Organization

Other Staff LSC-funded Organization

Board Member LSC-funded Organization

Client LSC-funded Organization

Chief Public Defender

Public Defender

Other Staff Defender Program

Client Defender Program

Bar Association

Student

Law School Representative

Court Representative

Private/Corporate Counsel

Law Firm Pro Bono Manager

Funder

Federal Government

State Government

Local Government

Other

How many times have you attended the NLADA Annual Conference before this year?

This is my first NLADA Annual Conference

2-5

6-10

11-15

15+

Overall, how would you rate this conference?

5 = Best

How relevant was the content of the conference to the work you do?

5 = Completely relevant

Please explain why the conference was or was not relevant to the work you do.

Overall, how would you rate the quality of the workshops you attended?

5 = Best

Please explain why you rated the workshops the way you did.

Which workshops were most helpful for you? Please explain why.

Which workshops were not helpful to you? Please explain why.

Do you think there were too many or too few workshop?

Too Many

Too Few

Just Enough to Choose From

How would you rate the overall quality of the plenary session speakers?

5 = Best

Please provide suggestions for future conference speakers.

Presenters were encouraged to use their expertise to promote discussion and problem solving, rather than simply talking at the audience. Did you find that most sessions provided an interactive experience?

Yes

Please explain your answer and/or give examples of presenters who succeeded or failed to do this well.

For sessions in which materials were distributed, did the materials help you participate in the session?

Yes

Please explain how the materials did or did not help.

To what extent did the conference address issues of diversity, cultural competency, language access, race, and similar issues affecting your programs and clients?

5 = Completely Addressed

Please explain your answer about issues of diversity, cultural competency, etc.

Were there any issues or program topics not adequately covered in the conference?

Yes

If your answer is yes, please explain what issues or topics you wanted better addressed.

Please provide suggestions for future topics.

How would you rate the overall networking experience of the conference?

5 = Best

Please explain your answer about networking and provide any suggestions for additional networking opportunities.

How would you rate the exhibit area?

5 = Best

Please explain your answer about the exhibit area.

How would you rate these aspects of the registration process? (5 = Best)

	1	2	3	4	5	N/A
Marketing	1	2	3	4	5	N/A

Website	1	2	3	4	5	N/A

Online Registration	1	2	3	4	5	N/A

Onsite Registration	1	2	3	4	5	N/A

Please explain any of your answers about the registration process.

Did you apply for CLE credit for the conference?

Yes

Was CLE credit a consideration in deciding whether or not to attend the conference?

Yes

Do you plan to attend the 2020 NLADA Annual Conference in Arlington, Virginia?

Yes

Likely

Not Sure

Unlikely

If you do not plan to attend the 2020 Annual Conference, please tell us why. Check all that apply.

The subject matter will not continue to be important to me

The focus of the conference is too repetitive

The conference is too expensive

The conference is not well delivered

Arlington is not convenient

Other

Please provide any additional comments you may have about this year's conference.